Poster Presentation Australian & New Zealand Obesity Society 2016 Annual Scientific Meeting

Add health stars to reduce kilojoules? Effects of health star labelling on the kilojoule content of adults’ fast food meal selections (#257)

Philippa Niven 1 , Belinda Morley 1 , Helen Dixon 1 , Jane Martin 2 , Alexandra Jones 3 , Kristina Petersen 3 , Melanie Wakefield 1
  1. Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  2. Obesity Policy Coalition, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  3. Food Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Background: People substantially underestimate the energy content of fast food meals.

Aim: To test whether the addition of Health Star Rating (HSR) labelling to kilojoule (kJ) labelling on menus at fast food outlets would prompt consumers to select meals with fewer kJs.

Methods: A between-subjects experimental design, whereby 1,007 NSW adults aged 18-49 were allocated to one of four menu labelling conditions: (i) no labelling; (ii) kJ labelling; (iii) HSR labelling; and (iv) kJ + HSR labelling. Using an online methodology, respondents were presented with their menu boards and instructed to select an evening meal as they would at a fast food restaurant. Programming required participants to select at least one item overall, and up to five mains and sides, two drinks and three desserts. A one-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni adjustment, was conducted to test for differences in the total mean kJ content of respondents’ evening meal selections by menu labelling condition.

Results: Overall, the mean kJ content of meals selected did not differ significantly by menu labelling condition (p>0.05).  This was consistent across demographic characteristics, BMI, perceived weight status, usual frequency of eating at fast food restaurants, and self-reported importance of nutrition when eating out.  However, among respondents who reported using menu board nutrition information to assist meal selection (n=343, 34%), mean kJ content of meals differed significantly by condition (p=0.034).  Respondents shown kJ + HSR menu labelling selected meals with a significantly lower kJ content compared to those shown HSR labelling only (4751 kJ cf. 5745 kJ, p=0.038).

Conclusion: For the sample as a whole, the addition of HSR to kJ labelling on menus did not afford a clear reduction in the mean kJ of meals selected. However, among the minority of respondents who made use of nutrition information, it enabled them to select less energy-dense meals.