BACKGROUND: While obesity is a strong risk-factor for insulin-resistance, some obese individuals are as insulin-sensitive as lean individuals. However, whether insulin-sensitive obesity is an enduring phenotype remains unknown.
METHODS: Subjects were studied at the Garvan1,2 (2007-2010) using hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamps and DXA to measure insulin resistance and body composition, respectively (n=101, ‘baseline studies’). Participants were categorised as lean (BMI<25kg/m2), overweight/obese insulin-sensitive or overweight/obese insulin-resistant (Obsen or Obres; above or below median glucose infusion rate, respectively). Subjects were followed up after 6±1yr. Fifty-nine individuals had their weight, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measured; a sub-cohort agreed to participate in repeat clamp and DXA studies (n=42).
RESULTS: Average age at follow-up was 60±11yr. Insulin sensitivity (P=0.43), BMI (P=0.53) and body fat mass (P=0.10) did not change significantly over time in this cohort. Despite this, visceral abdominal fat (P=0.004), SBP (P=0.002) and DBP (P<0.001) increased, without a difference between groups (Pinteraction≥0.34). At baseline, insulin sensitivity was 90±40% and 40±10%, relative to lean, in Obsen (P=0.62) and Obres (P<0.001), respectively. This finding persisted at follow-up (78±31%, P=0.46; and 44±15%, P<0.001, in Obsen and Obres relative to lean, respectively). At baseline, SBP (120±10mmHg) and DBP (76±7mmHg) measured in Obsen were not statistically different to lean (114±14mmHg, P=0.09; and 71±9mmHg, P=0.051, respectively), but were markedly lower than Obres (136±19mmHg, P=0.01; and 86±9mmHg, P<0.001, respectively). This pattern also persisted at follow-up where Obsen had similar SBP (126±19mmHg) and DBP (79±10mmHg) to lean (124±21mmHg, P=0.97; and 79±14mmHg, P=0.99, respectively), but values were lower than Obres (143±17mmHg, P=0.02; and 91±12mmHg, P=0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSION: We observed that in Obsen, relative normotension and insulin sensitivity was preserved over 6 years, suggesting a phenotype distinct from Obres. These findings may partly explain relative protection from cardiovascular disease observed in Obsen relative to Obres in longitudinal studies.